Make Text Larger Make Text Smaller Email this Article to a Friend Print this Article

Comment - The sacking of Bishop Bill Morris

Published: January 22, 2012

In May last year, the Bishop of Toowoomba, Bill Morris, was involuntarily removed from his office by Pope Benedict XVI on the grounds of "defective pastoral leadership". The dismissal is now the subject of legal review; QC’s opinion and a canon lawyer’s analysis were released last week. But the process that led to the bishop’s sacking began more than seven years ago, writes Father Michael Kelly in The Tablet.

Bishop Morris is from Brisbane but by temperament and style he is very much a "bush priest". The climate of the Australian outback makes few concessions and if you survive, it breeds wiry and resilient types. Affectionately regarded for his pastoral style, he is a man of the people who had a successful racehorse, Bishop Bill, named after him.

Perhaps the racing connection nurtured the attitude he has needed since 2004 – ever alert to surprises and upsets, and trained to live with disappointments. Bishop Morris’ first upset occurred when he arrived at the Vatican in late 2004 for what he later described as an ambush.

He was invited by Cardinal Francis Arinze, then the Prefect of the Congregation for Worship and Sacraments, to discuss the continuing use in his diocese of the Third Rite of Reconciliation, which offers participants general absolution but whose use had become limited following John Paul II’s 2002 apostolic letter, Misericordia Dei.

Bishop Morris was surprised when he arrived alone for the meeting to find the cardinal flanked by an archbishop and two monsignors, apparently canon lawyers. He felt ambushed because the "discussion" was based on claims, which he had not seen, from unnamed accusers about his pastoral practices and permission for the Third Rite to be held under certain conditions in his diocese.

The Diocese of Toowoomba is vast; priests are few and ageing; there are 66,000 Catholics; 36 parishes are served by 28 active priests. In the circumstances, pastoral visitation and celebration of the sacraments are rare in many places. The bishop explained that in these conditions, some flexibility was needed if the sacraments were to be available.

The cardinal and his companions said the practice was forbidden and should end. Bishop Morris complied and from that date Third Rite celebrations ceased in Toowoomba. But apparently Rome was not satisfied.

FULL STORY Rites and wrongs (The Tablet)

 

 

 

Response to articles is welcome. Simply follow the prompts to post your comment. No posting of more than 250 words will be published. While critical comment on stories and issues is welcomed, postings that descend to personal attacks on or impugn the integrity of other commentators will be blocked. Please use your own name, or initials, eg John Brown, or JB, or JAB, or Johnny. You are also required to add your location - as in, Sunshine, Victoria. Please provide your email address in the line supplied, followed by your contact phone number. These are requested for identification purposes only and will not be published. If you have any problems, please email news@cathnews.com


 


Recent Comments

  1. It is somewhat ironic that Pope Benedict uses the phrase 'defective pastoral leadership' in order to justify his dismissal of Bp Morris, when on any balanced reading of the issues faced by the dioceses of Toowoomba, one could be forgiven for thinking that Bp Morris was a most effective pastor. The reports by retired Queensland judge Bill Carter and Melbourne canon lawyer, Fr Ian Waters (about the canonical aspects of the report), make very unsettling reading. Principally, both reports find that Bp Morris was denied natural justice both in common law and canon law and that he has been treated in an manifestly unfair manner. Pope Benedict said that, when dismissing bishops, popes are not bound by process. This raises a profound question of whether a pope should have the authority to act without due process particularly if the issue isn’t theological but one of procedural fairness, as is the case in Bp Morris dismissal. My non-Catholic friends (not only non-Catholics) are shocked that Bp Morris can be treated in a manner that appears feudal, out of touch with modern judicial practice and cruel. The action taken by Church hierarchy has underpinned perceptions that it has learned nothing from recent clerical abuse scandals and that it is [still] arrogant, particularly treating one of its own so badly. Given this case I have to shamefully agree.

  2. Well, now that we have independent civl and canonical experts expressing their concerns re the nature of Bishop Morris' removal by Rome,can we hope for a corresponding examination of conscience by those involved in this process. Can we even dare hope that the Roman authorities might even listen carefully to the words of Micah - 'One thing that Yahweh asks of you - to live justly, to love tenderly and to walk in the prescenc eof your God' Mike Schell Santa Teresa

  3. The real question now is: who is going to be sufficiently 'disturbed' to actually move from reflection to remedial action? My guess is no one. The Australian bishops have failed miserably. And, if indeed 'canon law provides for natural justice..for the dismissal of priests but not for bishops' what kind of church is this that demands obedience to its magisterium? Like the emperor, it's revealed to be naked, without integrity. Finally, what is meant by 'reconciliation'? If, as seems to be suggested, that the victim should simply forgive and forget then the word 'reconciliation' has also been devalued. There can be no reconciliation as long as natural justice is denied a place at the table. Increasingly, the case is being made for Popes to retire rather than dying in office.

  4. A boringly predictable and pre-determined 'finding' by a group of self-appointed and self-proclaimed 'experts' with no authority over anyone or anything, and whose opinions are of no consequence whatsoever. The use of the Third Rite was not 'limited' in 2002. Its use outside of extremely rare cases (such as would never have occurred in Australia) has never been permitted anywhere. Misericordia Dei merely restated this for the benefit of those who had been defying it.

  5. I am a priest, ordained in July, 1961, to minister in parishes in Sydney archdiocese. In 1974, after serving in five(5) different parishes, I sought, and was eventually granted, a dispensation from my commitment to celibacy, married, and have lived as a married layman for all these subsequent years.
    However, I was ordained a priest forever.
    As one sharing in the priesthood of Bishop Bill, I'll continue to pray that he will be soon reinstated to his Episcopal duties, confident that God certainly wants this to be.
    Keep smiling with Jesus, Bill.

  6. Peter G: Big magisterial call on your part in paragraph I. One you might recall the old debating rule, 'What is freely asserted may be freely denied.' It applies here. But, since you are fond of quoting papal authority and Conciliar dogmas to rebuke and refute you might just look up what Pope Benedict XVI said recently to the judges on the Roman Rota (the Vatican Judiciary). He speaks about the need for a meticulous application of Justice when interpreting the law. Your habit of making the universal statement of absolute truth and certainty is breathtaking. If you knew the Law you would appreciate what it actually presumes and what it demands. One of the common charges made by 1st C CE Jews against the Pharisees was that they were preoccupied with whitewashing the Wall around the Law. (Sounds a lot like whitewashed sepulchres full of dead peoples' bones.)

  7. General Reconciliation Canon 961`2
    ... 'a serious necessity exists .. when in light of of the number of penitents a supply of confessors is not readily available rightly to hear the confessions of individuals within a suitable time....
    '2 It is for the diocesan bishop to judge whether the conditions required..are present; he can determine general cases of such necessity in the light of criteria agreed upon with other members of the conference of bishops.'
    It seems to me that our local bishops have the authority to re-instate Bishop Morris, and to revoke the acts of dobbers who may have misled the Pope.

  8. Peter G: So injustice is boring. Strange that what God forbids us you find so boring.
    Thank God, God does not.
    Your attack on the integrity of the lawyers involved in the report is very sad. I think you owe them an apology. Are their opinions of no consequence because you, who have no authority in this matter, say so?

  9. David: Once again your criticism of my comments seems to bear no relation to what I actually said.
    I have never claimed any magisterial authority for anything I have said. I merely pointed out that these self-proclaimed experts, like me and you, do not have any authority.
    I did not, Francis, say anything about their integrity, of which I know nothing.
    I note that here, as always David, you have made no such accusations against those expressing equally if not more forthright comments which you happen to agree with.

  10. Peter G: It seems to me that you appear to be a stickler for the law and authority of the Vatican (I, of course, could be wrong).
    I guess that is why you appear critical of any one who defends Bp Morris treatment.
    Maybe we should read John 8 vs 3-11, and refect how the law was treated here.

  11. Bishop Morris's main objection to the ordinary (1st) rite of confession was not so much that it was hard to find an available priest, but that it was too embarrassing to confess to a priest known to you.
    He said this a long time ago to a group delegation, and I think in one of his public interviews.
    But all successful self-help groups have this as their base - that one must own one's actions in public - I did it, I'm sorry, and the embarrassment is part of the healing process.
    Also, country people are much more mobile nowdays as roads and cars have improved.
    People travel a long distance for sport (eg Thargomindah to Charleville, a four hour drive), so there are very few people that couldn't access a priest if it was really important to them.
    Finally, all priests make a strict vow of secrecy: they can refuse to give absolution if the penitent has not removed from the occasions (eg a child molester from access to children) but they are not allowed go to any authorities.

  12. Peter G, Re-read your own email and you will see that you were, in fact, impugning the integrity of these two men, one a retired supreme court judge and the other, I believe, a canon lawyer. Did you not refer to them as: self-appointed and self-proclaimed 'experts' with no authority over anyone or anything, and whose opinions are of no consequence whatsoever. And this from one who often writes as though he is an expert and authority. Seems to me a case of pull the log out of ones own eye before trying to remove the splinter from your brother's eyes.

  13. Chris: I re-read John 8:3-11. I couldn't find any part where it said that when the Pope makes a disciplinary decision, we should reject it and tell him that he is wrong.

Bookmark and Share

More from this section

  1. Feature - The seventh Chinese cardinal in the church

    As they celebrate the New Year and enter the Year of the Dragon, Chinese Catholics have additional reasons for rejoicing: Pope Benedict XVI will make Hong Kong’s Bishop John Tong Hon a cardinal on February 18 and, for the first time in history, there will be three Chinese in the College of Cardinals, reports the Vatican Insider.

  2. Featured website - Justice products

    Justice Products was initiated by the Brisbane Catholic Worker community in 1985. More than 25 years later, it continues as a not-for-profit shop, following the principles of Fair Trade and community participation.

  3. Radio review - The Spirit of Things

    Sally Read is an acclaimed poet and former psychiatric nurse in London, who was raised as an atheist but recently was received into the Catholic Church in the Vatican. She talks about her conversion on The Spirit of Things.

  4. Comment - Tortured leader of world's first megachurch

    The world's first "megachurch" did not originate in 1950s America. It sprouted in 15th century Florence. It was called San Marco and was led by a fiery preacher and friar named Girolamo Savonarola, writes Jon Sweeney in the Huffington Post.

     

  5. Feature - Catholic schools find new ways to stay afloat

    Struggling American Catholic schools are finding new ways of making money, reports NCR Online. Schools that are thriving have had to seek other forms of revenue from foundations, local businesses and alumni.

Church Resources provides a range of services for the Church and not-for-profit sector, including aggregating buying power for a wide range of products and services used by health, welfare, aged care, education and parish organisations. More »

Mass streamed live daily

From Our Lady of the Rosary Cathedral, Waitara, in the Broken Bay Diocese.
Weekdays live at 9.30am
Saturdays live 9.30am (followed by Adoration and Benediction)
Sundays live 9.30am
Click on this link at the appropriate time to connect.

Subscribe

To receive headlines from our faith-based news services, please subscribe below.

Email address

Newsletter


 

News Feed

Subscribe to the CathNews RSS feed to get the daily edition automatically delivered to you.
Subscribe to Faith Project RSS.