Make Text Larger Make Text Smaller Email this Article to a Friend Print this Article

CathBlog - Australian Catholics must welcome 'imported' priests

Published: March 16, 2011

BY MAURIZIO PETTENA

There are surveys which suggest that 90 per cent of Catholic priests are happy in their job, but yet some recent media on the subject would suggest that we are in an insurmountable crisis of faith in this country. 

Much of the criticism aimed at the Catholic Church, sometimes from within its ranks, is aimed at those who appear to ignore the decline in vocations, and try to patch up the problem with foreign clergy who cannot acculturate.

Indeed, it cannot be denied that the Catholic Church in Australia is in need of pastoral workers at various levels, due to an increase in Catholic populations. The Catholic Church in Australia is more significantly impacted by migration than most.  As such, Bishops are responding to this need in a way that is possible for our time, and in a way which has already brought unforeseen gifts.

I am one of those overseas priests and I wish to comment on this from my experience and knowledge of working extensively with migrant communities. I have worked in Australia for over 20 years as a migrant chaplain and a parish priest as a member of a missionary order of priests.

My duty as the Director of the Australian Catholic Migrant and Refugee office is among other things to liaise with the Department of Immigration on the Labour Agreement which allows us to bring to Australia priests, sisters, brothers and lay pastoral workers from overseas. These people are volunteering to come to this country as missionaries and many of them have become pastors who are deeply loved by their congregations.

This is not new to Australia. We have always had missionary priests coming to Australia from countries such as Ireland to help in building the universal Church. In the Catholic tradition, we have priests who are called fide donum, literally, a gift of faith. These priests are present as missionaries, interacting pastorally with an ever increasing multicultural Church, visible in practically every country of the world.

There are many gifts that come from this, including the privilege of welcoming people who come from thriving Catholic communities. The international and multicultural flavour this brings and the revitalisation of the liturgy can be seen in hundreds of parishes across this country. 

The parochial attitudes of those who see bringing foreign clergy to this country as a bandaid solution, rather than an immense gift and possibility for renewal, are as much responsible for the decline in faith of Australians as the Bishops they seek to blame.

It is my view that negative views of the migrant priest phenomenon, which is that Bishops “import” from overseas out of desperation; whereas in many ways I believe it should be seen as a sign of the Bishops’ commitment to providing for the Catholic faithful.

Vocations are not growing in Australian dioceses for many reasons, and there is a need for careful reflection on this – but we also need to remember that we are a universal Church which cannot seek to limit the cultural background of its clergy due to lack of understanding.

The harm we do in showing frankly racist attitudes toward those who have come here in generosity is extremely upsetting. We can take a more positive role in helping these migrant priests to get used to Australian culture, but instead, we simply criticise them for being “ignorant, tribal or patriarchal.”

It is true that sometimes it takes migrant clergy time to adjust to life in this country. Just as it takes awhile for migrants to learn another language, there are cultural norms that will be unfamiliar. Often, clergy and religious that come here are placed too soon into communities extremely different to their own. But the immense benefits of learning from one another and growing together in the liturgy and ministry of the Church may be just what this country needs. 

We really owe an apology to all of the overseas priests who have laid down their lives to come here and serve for the criticism that is often aimed at them. We have always had foreign clergy in this country, whether it be the early Irish missionaries right through to migrant chaplains that selflessly serve the migrant communities in our nation, which at this moment in our history make up the majority of practising Catholics.

Maurizio PettenaFather Maurizio Pettena CS is the Director of the Australian Catholic Migrant and Refugee Office. He was recently appointed to the Pontifical Council for Migrants and Refugees.

 

 

Disclaimer: CathBlog is an extension of CathNews story feedback. It is intended to promote discussion and debate among the subscribers to CathNews and the readers of the website. The opinions expressed in CathBlog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the members of the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference or of Church Resources.

 

Response to articles is welcome. Simply follow the prompts to post your comment. No posting of more than 250 words will be published. While critical comment on stories and issues is welcomed, postings that descend to personal attacks on or impugn the integrity of other commentators will be blocked. Please use your own name, or initials, eg John Brown, or JB, or JAB, or Johnny. You are also required to add your location - as in, Sunshine, Victoria. Please provide your email address in the line supplied, followed by your contact phone number. These are requested for identification purposes only and will not be published. If you have any problems, please email news@cathnews.com


 


Recent Comments

  1. Father Maurizio: It is a great shame that you lump together all those with concerns about 'foreign clergy' as 'racist'.
    There is a lot of nuance in this situation that gets erased by sweeping attacks.

    No doubt some folk may be motivated by racist views, others not so, rather a frustration that the very real causes of the decline of priestly and religious life that are peculiar to Western contexts are not being addressed simply by having some fill the 'hatch, match and despatch' functions.

    In fact such mere filling of roles is a slight against the 'foreign priest' who is being treated by bishops as a mere filler, while the underlying problems simply grow around him.

    The problem is not 'racism', such jingoism is a purely flippant and deliberately distracting assertion; rather the problem is the unwillingness or the utter incapacity of bishops to grapple with and intuit the depth of the cultural challenges posed to the institutional church by Western culture(s).

    'Foreign priests' need to be celebrated as more than numbers and functionaries behind which the bishops hide.

  2. I totally agree with Father Maurizio Pettena's blog.
    We are part of a Parish without a resident priest for many years. We have had wonderful administrator priests - some of whom who have been migrant priests and I can't speak hightly enough of their attitude, dedication, holiness, generosity in coming and willingness to learn about our culture.
    At present we do not even have a administrator priest available due to the shortage of priests in our diocese. If we were fortunate enough to be given another administrator priest we would be so grateful regardless of where he came from and would make him feel very welcome.

  3. Thank you, Fr. Maurizio, for making such a good point so clearly.
    We are a migrant church -- the share of Catholics born overseas is much higher than in the general population, and the share of mass attenders higher still -- so why should we be worried about migrant clergy, who frequently come from the same places that are the source of migrant lay Catholics?
    We should be treating multiculturalism as an opportunity, not a threat, and leave the paranoia to Pauline Hanson and her friends.

  4. So very well said!
    A slightly different perspective that I hadn't thought of before, but I have long been for the idea of bringing Priests from overseas because the Mass is the same Mass everywyere (or it should be), and our Catholic faith is supposed to be the same throughout the world!

  5. Any rudeness exhibited to priests from other countries is inexcusable. Personally, I would like to very politely ask them to go home.
    The countries many of them come from have enormous needs.
    The Church in Australia will not evolve to meet its own needs while clerical 'stop gaps' are found.
    It's time for the laity to be allowed to step up to the plate. A lay Church with a strong sense of responding to the Holy Spirit will, if God wills, be provided with the priests it needs to meet sacramental and liturgical needs.

  6. A long overdue article.
    Racist attitudes to foreign-born priests such as calling them “stop-gaps” and even telling them to “go home” are inexcusable and far too common.
    The proportion of foreign-born priests in Australia is still much less than the proportion of foreign-born Catholics.
    However, Fr Pettena’s statement that “Vocations are not growing in Australian dioceses” is true of only some dioceses, by no means all.
    In many Australian dioceses including two of the three largest, vocations are growing steadily.

  7. Mark Johnson writes: 'rather the problem is the unwillingness or the utter incapacity of bishops to grapple with and intuit the depth of the cultural challenges posed to the institutional church by Western culture(s)'
    My observation is that the faith has been so watered down that it is no longer recognisable by most 'catholics' in my part of the world.
    My experience as a religious educator in schools and in adult faith formation is that when young people and adults are presented with authentic Catholicism it is recognised deep in their soul where the seed was sown by their baptism and they respond with great joy.
    I have met a number of our foreign clergy and seminarians and observed that they have a zeal for evangelism that we westerners have lost (because we do not actually believe that Christianity is life-giving).
    They are also very open to the promptings of the Holy Spirit (again something the west has lost because we only pay lip-service to the supernatural).
    We are a migrant church, many of our new migrants are from India and Africa - as are our new priests.
    It is time for us to get over our preciousness about the unique 'Australian Church' and realise that the Gospel knows no geographic or national boundaries.

  8. We should celebrate and hang up huge welcome signs for the priests who leave their country to come and serve here.
    Our young people might actually start to ponder why someone will give up so much to serve the Lord - and this will then result in more vocations here in Australia.
    To accuse the bishops of using them as mere fillers is very harsh and unless proven wrong I think that most if not all bishops have given a lot of careful thought to it and see it as one way of addressing the 'underlying problem'. And I am confident that the Holy Spirit is guiding our bishops and pray that they will recruit many more priests overseas as these priests are breathing new life into our churches and are providing spiritual support for our overworked priests.

  9. 'Vocations are not growing in Australian dioceses for many reasons, and there is a need for careful reflection on this – but we also need to remember that we are a universal Church which cannot seek to limit the cultural background of its clergy due to lack of understanding.'
    Has anyone asked married men or women if they feel they have a vocation? No of course not... how can then you say that vocations are not growing!

  10. Agree very much with Mark Johnson here-though if Fr Maurizio has experienced or witnessed racism that is extremely regrettable.
    The problems of the cultural divide are huge, and from my observations routinely underestimated. This is unfair to both parishioners and priests themselves.
    And, as Mark rightly says, importing priests simply masks a serious underlying problem.
    I have very great admiration and respect for the young men who come to Australia to serve. But in the long run this is not a solution and we do no one a favour by pretending otherwise.

  11. The Diocese of Maitland/Newcastle N.S.W. has many Priests from India working in our Parishes.
    My personal experience has been one of comfort and indeed joy in working and praying with these men, both in the Eucharistic celebration and in Chaplaincy work in hospitals, nursing homes and home visits to the shut-in/house bound members of our communities.
    Welcome indeed, fellow Christians.

  12. I totally agree all the priests i have met who have come from overseas are all wonderfull men.
    How the times have changed once we sent our our priests to other countrys as missionaries.
    Now they are coming to us. I also support married priests.In my parish we are very fortunate to have an ex uniting church minister his wife and three teenage children what an assett they are to the parish.
    Like all elders of the community I wondered how he would fit in. Not only have they fitted in and loved by the parishners.
    Please pray for vocations.

  13. A very thoughtful and timely article. Thank you very much

  14. Leo XIII wrote in Ad extremas: Since a foreign clergy, therefore, has difficulty in winning the hearts of the people, it is plain that the work of a native clergy would be far more fruitful. From experience, they know the nature and customs of their people; they know when to speak and when to keep silent.
    Was Leo XIII racist?
    In the United States and Europe, the ratio of priests to baptized Catholics is roughly 1-1,300.
    Here’s the same ratio in other regions:
    Sub-Saharan Africa: 1-4,786
    The Caribbean: 1-8,347
    Latin America: 1-7,081
    Southeast Asia: 1-5,322
    At least from a strictly arithmetic point of view, one could argue that the bumper crop of new priests being turned out by Catholic seminaries in the global South is far more urgently needed at home.
    That reality has not escaped the attention of the Vatican. In 2001, a document titled “Instruction on the Sending Abroad and Sojourn of Diocesan Priests from Mission Territories” was issued by the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples said such transfers were damaging to the church in the global South.
    India, for example, doesn’t have enough priests to take care of its 17 million Catholics, yet at that time there were 39 priests from India working in one Italian diocese alone. NCR, February 26, 2010)

  15. Fr Mauricio and all the clergy from overseas are most welcome to come to Australia.
    As a woman, I am seeking to pursue ministry experience in another denomination because women can't be priests in the catholic church.
    Congratulations to all those who seek to be ministers in whatever denomination they choose.
    The Christian ministry is in great need of ministers regardless of denomination, gender, sexual orientation,or ability.
    Good luck Father Mauricio and the missionaries as I would expect all to wish me luck in my endeavours as a female to excel in Christ's ministry and would pray for you all as well as I would expect people to pray for myself and all those who hear the call to ministry.
    Pray that the God of the harvest may call many more to increase the number of labourers.
    And a happy St Patrick's Day to you all!

  16. Surely, racist slurs are an exception - I have experienced wonderful foreign Priests including two at present in our Parish.
    This is not the real issue!
    Foreign Priests come from cultures foreign to us as against the past Irish.
    We have studied dwindling numbers for decades. Unless the Hierarchy finds solutions for the twentyfirst century such as married Priests, Women Priests, voluntary celibacy of Priests (none of which are anti-scripture!), the drain will continue.

  17. Part of the problem might not be racist but the fact that people here practice a very watered down type of Catholisism.
    I have worked in parishes in East Timor and visited the same in Europe and have noticed people here drifting away from the 'the rules' so to speak. People here are materialistic, self-centred and selfish.
    They often walk up to Communion after not being to Mass for months, watch TV shows such as 2 and a Half Men, drink to excess, swear and generally to do lead good Catholic lives.
    A new foreign priest may preach against this type of lifestyle (being not used to this at home) and people here are offside which can lead to racism.
    I get the feeling that the Church in the west is preaching on a Softly Softly basis so as not to lose more followers. At least Cd Pell is on the right track.

  18. The problem is not the lack of respect. I find it hard to believe that people from whatever race would not be treated as equals.
    The problem, as usual, is that it is the male authority within the Catholic Church telling the people who gather within the churches who and how they are to be led.
    When will they realise that they are no longer dealing with ignorant Yes-sayers, but with well-educated, intelligent people of strong faith, who are quite competent of putting forward a leader of their own from amongst their own? Whether this be a woman or a man, married or single, Australian or foreigner.

  19. Excellently written, Fr Pettena. You've expressed well what I and many parishioners have thought.
    I was born in SE Asia more than 4 decades ago.
    Our priests there were from Ireland and France. If knowledge of customs were important, none of them should have set foot outside of Europe.
    (And the great missionary martyrs should never have travelled to the ends of the earth to evangelise anyone but their own race and culture).
    But we Asian Catholics managed, and we were evangelised by the example of sacrifice that these dedicated priests made.
    And if numbers were the basis for missionary work, then by rights none of them ought to have been in an overwhelmingly Muslim country where there were very few Catholics - there was much more work for them back in Europe.
    So, to all overseas priests here in Australia: I extend a warm welcome to you and sincere and heartfelt thanks for the great sacrifices you have made.

  20. I thank Fr Pettena for his thoughtful and timely blog.
    It is clear from some of the comments that readers either did not understand or do not accept Fr Pettena's statement that 'The parochial attitudes of those who see bringing foreign clergy to this country as a bandaid solution, rather than an immense gift and possibility for renewal, are as much responsible for the decline in faith of Australians as the Bishops they seek to blame.'
    I would go further and, rather than laying the responsibility for the decline in faith on people with these attitudes and, as Mr Johnson claims, the incapacity of bishops, I would say that a decline in faith is the responsibility of all the faithful.
    I believe that a decline in faith is linked to our, the faithful's, inability to demonstrate the unconditional love that Jesus taught and demonstrated two thousand years ago.
    Yes, we can rightly ask, as Mr Rees states, why the racial and cultural diversity in our congregations is not mirrored in our clergy. We should also ask ourselves why the twenty per cent of the general population that has some form of disability is not reflected in our congregations or our clergy.
    Our attitude to racially or culturally diverse clergy and those with disability points to our inability or unwillingness to love unconditionally, to seek to form relationship and to act as Jesus would.
    It is up to each of us.

  21. Charles (Brisbane): Over on another story you asked the following questions: Where did Jesus promise infallibility to Peter and his successors? Where does Jesus speak of Peter even having successors? Where did Peter, in the New Testament, exercise infallibility?
    And yet now, to suit a point you wish to make, you want to quote as an authority a pope who has been dead over 100 years. This ecclesiology is mighty strange, Charles, not to say inconsistent.

  22. James Rogerson: What a strange conclusion you draw. You seem to suggest that popes are infallible in everything. You did not answer my questions that you now quote back at me. Why not? Is it that you cannot?
    I quoted Leo XIII because there are some RCs who do believe that popes are infallible in everything.
    It's interesting that you disagree with Leo XIII. I find that refreshing and you are to be congratulated. Obviously you are not one of those who suggest that popes cannot be challenged.
    My ecclesiology is largely influenced by the New testament not by medieval exaggeration.

  23. No Charles, Popes are not 'infallible in everything'.
    Neither are they impeccable: so, there's no problem in theory with saying Leo XIII is 'racist'- although I'd say that allegation is hardly proven.
    I don't have time or space to run you through the Scriptural, patristic and historical evidence for papal infallibility; nor to explain the organic development of dogma.
    But I still ask: why do you cite Leo XIII at the same time as denying the continuation of the Petrine office?

  24. Charles (Brisbane): Don’t unquestioningly believe anything about the Church that you read in the “NCR” (the USA “National Catholic Reporter”).
    The Catholic Bishops’ Conference of India reports that India has 27,500 priests (overwhelmingly native-born and average age in their 30s) for the 17.3 million Indian Catholics. Australia has just over 3000 priests (average age in their 60s) for 5.2 million Catholics. We could double the number of priests in Australia, just by importing Indian priests, and India would still have way more priests per head of Catholic population than we do.
    Leo XIII was talking about non-European countries which in his time had an almost entirely European clergy – quite a scandal at the time. That is not and will never be the case in Australia. We have many native priests, but we need foreign-born priests too, as does every country.
    Leo’s words were in fact a complaint against racism – the attitude among many Catholics that Western European or Anglo-Celtic priests are better in all respects. An attitude which, it is sadly apparent, is still prevalent in some quarters, though some hide it behind more politically-correct slogans.

  25. Father Maurizio: Thanks for your comments but they are not an accurate assessment of the situation.
    The laity have not been consulted by the bishops about the 'importation' of these priests.
    Neither have they been part of any assimilation process of these priest becoming part of the parish.
    Both of the above processes would seem normal events to any thinking person.
    When priests turn up from overseas with very different views about consultation, the equality of women and the exercise of power, it is a situation set to cause resentment and other reactions.
    Why not spend your time explaining what are currently the issues to your superiors? I am sure they are just waiting to hear from you?
    Why not start in Queensland if the southern states are a problem?

  26. Laurie Sheehan: I'm not aware of any obligation on the part of bishops to consult with parishoners about what you call the 'importation' of priests. You write that foreign priests hold 'very different' views about consultation, the equality of women and the exercise of power.
    This is a very sweeping and general allegation.
    Can you give me one example of a Catholic priest from anywhere in the world who does not believe in 'the equality of women'?
    If you can't, would you mind apologising for slurring foreign-born clergy? Thanks, Laurie.

  27. James Rogerson: Re the term 'Petrine office'.
    What is meant by the term anyway? There is no mention of it in the New Testament. You will most certainly not find any eveidence for infallibility of anyone, other than Christ, in the New testament. Peter did not occupy an office superior to the others. Paul was not prepared to cede Peter any special powers.
    In fact, Peter's office, in Scripture, is limited to the circumcised whilst Paul's office is that of oversight of the non-Jewish Christians.
    From Acts 15 it seems that James the brother of the Lord had a special authority since he, not Peter, gives the final decision. After this Peter disappears from Acts. He's never heard of again. There was no bishop of Rome until the second century.

  28. Peter G: I do not unquestioningly believe anything about the Church that I read in the “NCR” (the USA “National Catholic Reporter”). J
    ust as I do not unquestioningly believe everything that popes have said. I take it you believe nothing that is reported in NCR.
    Your interpretation of Leo XIII is just that: your interpretation and we have a tendency to interpret in terms of our prejudices, mind-sets etc.
    It's interesting that you refer to India. I did not. Many of our clergy are coming from Africa and Asia.
    Why import priests when we can have our own?

  29. So what is the relevance of citing Leo XIII, Charles?

  30. Pretty well every discussion on CathNews boils down to a question of methodology.
    Do we accept Scripture and Tradition and the guidance of the Magisterium or not? If we do, we are Catholics. Fine. If not, we are probably liberal protestants. Also fine.
    But Charles, not finding something explicitly stated in the NT is (for a Catholic) not conclusive in an argument.

  31. Those who push for laicisation of the roles of the clergy just because of their own shortfall in clerical vocations, should ask themselves: Who is going to shepherd God's people, if the Church doesn't send shepherds to do so?
    We can all do some shepherding, but only a few can do so in the capacity of the ordained priesthood.
    Who is going to evangelise (more correctly re-evangelise) if no-one is sent?
    The Church certainly calls on the laity, but the laity still need sacramental nourishment which comes with having a priest available.
    If we have priests from overseas, it is no different to say, colonial Australian Bishops recruiting priests from Ireland to minister in colonial Australia.
    The only difference now is that whilst certain Diocese might have decreasing numbers seeking to frequent the sacraments, the need for (re-)evangelisation is far greater than for colonial Australia. The response should be the same as the Australian Bishops of the past two centuries (or any Bishop anywhere): Recruit ordained ministers and/or professed religious (from whereever).

  32. James Rogerson: Why shouldn't one cite Leo XIII. After all, he is one of the Pilgrim People of God and all God's sons and daughters have a right to be heard... or do you disagree?

  33. James Rogerson: Not only is the petrine office, whatever that is, not found in the NT, but it is not found in the early tradition of the Church.
    One of many questions is: Who, today, fulfills the Pauline office?

  34. Charles: It's hard to know how to answer your question, because I don't know what methodology you would accept.
    I presume you are a non-Catholic, so my making recourse to Scripture, Tradition and Magisterium would carry no weight with you.
    I might suggest that you reread Mt 16:17-19; then reread Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Cyril of Jerusalem, Leo the Great etc.
    I might suggest more recent writers, such as Soloviev, Journet, Jaki, von Balthasar, Kaspar; the Orthodox theologian Olivier Clement etc.
    But ultimately, little of this will appeal to a sola scriptura Christian.

  35. Charles: As for your excellent question about the Pauline office, might I strongly recommend a reading of von Balthasar's The Office of Peter and the Structure of the Church?
    As for Leo - I'm happy to cite him as an occupier of the Petrine office.
    I'm a post-Vatican I Catholic.
    My question remains: Why you quote him as an authority while rejecting the doctrine of the pope?

  36. James Rogerson: Might I suggest that first you read the New testament for there you will find that there is no Petrine Office.
    Would you please develop a scriptural argument for your position other than basing the idea on a single verse. You did not answer my question: who, today, occupies the chair of Paul since Peter's oversight was only over the circumcised whilst Pauls was over the Gentile Christians?
    Your presumption that I am not a Catholic is wrong. There are various rites of Catholics.
    As indeed you are wrong re sola scriptura. However, I would have thought that you would take Sacred Scripture somehwat more seriously for there you would find no reference to a Petrine Office, whatever that means. Would you please explain what you understand by that phrase?
    Might I suggest you read Raymond Brown: Peter never served as bishop of any church...' Giacomo Martina SJ; Eamon Duffy etc. NB, even a number of the early Church Fathers held that the rock Jesus refers to is not Peter but his faith.
    Why do you, as a papal infallibilist, not accept Leo XIII's teaching? Refer my previous reply as to why I cite Leo XIII.
    Why shouldn't I? After all, he's one of my brothers.

  37. Why are there so many people saying there are reasons why young people are not going to Church, but not mentioning them.
    If this is going to be a place of dialogue, then these are the issues which need addressing.
    And as you are all fairly learned, I want to know what it is which is stopping young people from going to Church or becoming priests. Thanks..

  38. Charles: I'm a little bit confused by your answer to James. Could you clarify what you mean by there being different Rites in the Church. Are you not Roman? Are you Maronite or Byzantine or another?

    Regardless of your rite, however, you surely know that the relationship between Tradition and Scripture, as explained by Vatican II's Dei Verbum, means that there is no need for a solely scriptural basis for the Petrine Office. You should need no more evidence than a verse and the fact that the papacy exists. Scripture and Tradition in action! Scripture doesn't contain everything. Tradition completes the picture. Or do you disagree with Vatican II and the Church?

  39. Charles: I also think your a bit hard on Peter G saying that it is merely his interpretation of Leo XIII.
    He's just trying to be a good historian and give the quote some historical context as well as, or at least it seems to me, the context of the document in which it originally appeared.
    Surely you could give a more academic and rigorous defense of your interpretation.
    Not knowing the document in which it appeared myself, I would be more than happy to accept your interpretation if you could also give your interpretation of its context.
    Commenting more directly on the article itself, I'm all for 'importing' priests.
    Any group grows stagnant without some outside input and seeing as Australia is so multicultural, why should we shelter our clergy from the facts of our society?
    Let them come I say. The Church is so much bigger than a few Australians crying foul.

  40. Having been blessed with various “Religious Foreigners” as our Community Priests and Nuns,
    I know from experience that if they had not been 'imported' into this country, I would not have been able to ever know the religious views, cultures and experiences they have offered.
    Jesus made the ultimate sacrifice to save us – as these “Religious Foreigners” are doing the same on a spiritual level.
    They have brought their humility, strengths and beliefs to our country, to make us stronger and better practicing Catholics. They made the sacrifice of leaving their own family, friends and country behind, to be here in Australia to help us.
    Some might have also left the hardship faced in their own lives, to use the experiences to help those in need or less fortunate.
    It is not only the Clergy that are doing so, as there are many Lay Foreigners that come to this country and maintain their Religious views and cultural traditions.
    To another topic.. We treat Asylum seekers like criminals as they sacrifice their own lives to come to this country with the slim chance of even making it to our shores.
    Yet, we have an open port for foreigners who are able to pay for an air line ticket, who unfortunately could actually be a criminal.
    Though I am sure the Australian Government has controls and screening processes in place, those for Asylum seekers seem far too harsh, and unfortunately those for the average person, at times, not enough.

  41. To those that support 'imported priests': what is your view on the issue of Imans being trained overseas and then operating in Australia?

  42. Mark Johnson, really!

  43. A thought provoking article.
    We should embrace these clergy.
    I wonder too whether our more liberal 'home grown' clergy and faithful view these immigrant priests as just a bit too orthodox for our 'tastes' and messing up our notions of 'local church'.

  44. I strongly suspect that the advocates for women priests would not welcome the idea of 'imported priests' because it weakens their case.
    My only fear for these priests who so selflessly leave their home countries to come here to Australia, is that they will become infected with the dissension that prevails in so many parishes today... their formation needs to be absolutely solid!
    Let's pray that their faith remains intact and that we welcome them with love and gratitude.

  45. Peter from Canberra, You are dead right. Foreign Priests are a threat to the 'liberal' priests, as they mention hell, sin, commandments and all such terms that I have only heard from handful of Catholic priests in Australia. They are revealling the full and wondrous teaching for how to live to attain eternal salvation, that the majority of our priests have denied us for years. That is possibly the answer to your question, Marty Larsen.

Bookmark and Share

More from this section

  1. CathBlog - The Church's hand in exploiting problem gamblers' weakness

    Why are the clubs – including Catholic clubs – so upset by the reasonable proposals of the Productivity Commission? Put simply, their business plans depend on problem gamblers for much of their profit. But any business plan that depends on the misery of problem gambling is hardly an ethical business plan, writes Peter McArdle.

  2. CathBlog - Priest stress

    The underlying message of a vocations video was that if young men feel called to priesthood they need to be prepared to live extremely busy lives. The stress is showing on men who seem to have lost their zest for life as they face an even less certain future, writes Sister Carmel Pilcher.

  3. CathBlog - World Youth Day: looking forward, looking back

    My mum is busily making rosary beads for pilgrims from our Archdiocese. This will be her third World Youth Day, though she isn’t actually attending. She accompanied our Archdiocesan group to Toronto, Canada, in 2002, writes Beth Doherty.

  4. BlogWatcher - Comedian Lucy struggles with her atheism

    One blogger reviews Judith Lucy’s Spiritual Journey on ABC1 and observes that Judith is so impressed by three Sisters of Mercy that she wonders aloud whether she is having second thoughts about her rejection of Catholicism. Another has some advice on how to handle the conversation killer at parties ‘“I’m studying to be a Catholic priest.”

  5. CathBlog - Young Benedict questioned priestly celibacy

    The London Catholic Herald's Anna Arco blogs the news that Pope Benedict XVI "called for the Church to investigate priestly celibacy", in 1970 when he was a young priest.

Church Resources provides a range of services for the Church and not-for-profit sector, including aggregating buying power for a wide range of products and services used by health, welfare, aged care, education and parish organisations. More »

Mass streamed live daily

From Our Lady of the Rosary Cathedral, Waitara, in the Broken Bay Diocese.
Weekdays live at 9.30am
Saturdays live 9.30am (followed by Adoration and Benediction)
Sundays live 9.30am
Click on this link at the appropriate time to connect.

Subscribe

To receive headlines from our faith-based news services, please subscribe below.

Email address

Newsletter


 

News Feed

Subscribe to the CathNews RSS feed to get the daily edition automatically delivered to you.
Subscribe to Faith Project RSS.